基于孟德尔随机化和中医情志学说阐明不良情绪诱导慢性阻塞性肺疾病产生机制

Validating the pathogenic mechanism of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease induced by negative emotions via Mendelian randomization and traditional Chinese medicine theory of emotions

  • 摘要:
    目的 本研究采用孟德尔随机化(MR)方法检验中医情志病因理论,探索不良情绪与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)之间的因果关系。
    方法 从全基因组关联研究(GWAS)公共数据库下载不良情绪、支气管炎、肺气肿和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平的相关数据,开展双样本MR分析。筛选与不良情绪、支气管炎和肺气肿显著相关的独立单核苷酸多态性(SNP)作为工具变量。主要因果估计采用逆方差加权法(IVW),并辅以加权中位数(WM)法和简单模型(SM)法。敏感性分析包括MR-Egger回归和MR-PRESSO评估多重效应,Cochran's Q检验评估异质性,多变量MR用于调整吸烟影响;中介分析用于评估炎症标志物的作用;反向MR分析评估双向因果关系;弱工具变量偏倚通过F统计量(> 10)加以控制。所有分析在RStudio中进行。
    结果 MR分析发现多种不良情绪对COPD具有显著的因果效应:通过IVW分析方法,遗传层面的因神经紧张、焦虑或抑郁就诊ORIVW = 1.006,95% CI =(1.002, 1.010),P = 0.002,敏感/容易受伤ORIVW = 1.024,95% CI =(1.004, 1.044),P = 0.017,以及易怒ORIVW = 1.019,95% CI = (1.003, 1.035),P = 0.019均与COPD风险升高密切相关。抑郁(P = 0.655)与易怒(P = 0.163)相关工具变量之间未检测到异质性。所有情绪暴露变量的MR-Egger回归截距均接近零且无统计学意义,提示无方向性多重效应。除忧虑(MR-PRESSO P = 0.006)外,其他情绪暴露变量未见显著水平的多重效应偏倚。多变量MR分析显示,调整吸烟因素后,焦虑仍与COPD呈独立因果关系(P = 0.002),而其他不良情绪的关联性在调整后减弱。中介分析发现CRP介导了焦虑对COPD总效应的3.93%。反向MR分析未发现反向因果关系的证据。
    结论 本研究通过MR分析证实了不良情绪与COPD的因果关系,并揭示不良情绪可能诱导CRP的产生,而CRP在此因果链中发挥重要中介作用。该发现为中医情志致病理论提供了可靠的现代理论依据。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective We employed Mendelian randomization (MR) to test the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) theory of emotional pathogenesis concept and explore the causal relationship between negative emotions and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
    Methods Data of negative emotions, bronchitis, emphysema, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were downloaded from genome-wide association study (GWAS) public database for a two-sample MR analysis. Independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with negative emotions, bronchitis, and emphysema were selected as instrumental variables. Primary causal estimates were derived using inverse-variance weighting (IVW), supplemented by weighted median (WM), and simple mode (SM) methods. Sensitivity analyses included MR-Egger regression and MR-PRESSO to assess pleiotropy, Cochran’s Q test for heterogeneity, and multivariate MR to adjust for smoking. Mediation analysis evaluated the role of inflammatory markers. Reverse MR was tested for bidirectional causality. Weak instrument bias was mitigated via F-statistic thresholds (> 10). All analyses were conducted in RStudio.
    Results MR analysis identified significant causal effects of several negative emotions on COPD. Genetically, the IVW analysis of seen doctors for nerves anxiety tension or depression ORIVW = 1.006, 95% CI = (1.002, 1.010), P = 0.002, sensitivity/hurt feelings ORIVW = 1.024, 95% CI = (1.004, 1.044), P = 0.017, and irritability ORIVW = 1.019, 95% CI = (1.003, 1.035), P = 0.019 were robustly associated with increased risks of COPD. No heterogeneity was detected among the different instrumental variables (IVs) for depression (P = 0.655) and irritability (P = 0.163). MR-Egger regression intercepts for all emotional exposures were close to zero and statistically non-significant, indicating no evidence of directional pleiotropy. The horizontal pleiotropy results showed that except for worry (MR-PRESSO P = 0.006), other emotion exposures confirming no substantial pleiotropic bias. Multivariable MR demonstrated that anxiety remained independently associated with COPD after adjusting for smoking (P = 0.002), while associations with other negative emotions were attenuated post-adjustment. The mediation analysis revealed that CRP mediated 3.93% of the total effect of anxiety on COPD. However, reverse MR analysis found no evidence of reverse causality.
    Conclusion This study confirmed the causal effects of negative emotions on COPD through MR analysis and revealed that negative emotions may trigger CRP production, which plays an essential mediating role in this relationship. This study provides a reliable modern theoretical basis for emotion theory in TCM.

     

/

返回文章
返回